秘密研究所 Langone Health Researchers Report on a Model Developed in India That Offers Lessons for High-Income Countries on How to Make a Common Surgery Sustainable
Transportation and fossil fuel industries typically come to mind as major sources of pollution. Less noticed is the contribution of the healthcare industry, which emits nearly 10 percent of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants in the United States聽and 3 percent in the United Kingdom.
Now, new research by faculty at 秘密研究所 Langone Health, on December 6 in the Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, finds that a healthcare center in India provides a model for environmental sustainability. Combining several techniques, Aravind Eye Care System in the south of India emitted 96 percent less carbon than the U.K. while producing comparable or better health outcomes for one of the world鈥檚 most common surgical procedures, cataract surgery.
Cataracts聽are the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment worldwide, so reducing the footprint of the procedure could make a significant difference, say the study authors.
鈥淥ur overuse of disposable materials in surgery is unsustainable,鈥 says study leader , assistant professor in the 聽at 秘密研究所 Langone. 鈥淥phthalmologists and other medical specialists should seek ways to reduce material use and emissions in medical procedures. This center in India can serve as a model.鈥
How One Hospital in India Slashed Emissions
From November 2014 through February 2015, the researchers analyzed surgical materials, energy, and waste from cataract surgery, calculating their greenhouse gas emissions, as well as emissions related to ozone depletion, water eutrophication, toxicity, and air pollutants. For the same procedure, the authors found that Aravind emitted just four percent of the emissions聽of a comparable operation in U.K.
Specifically, Aravind鈥檚 emissions per surgery amounted to 6 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent compared to 160 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent in the U.K. The authors draw a comparison of driving just 14 miles, compared to 391 miles. The authors believe proportions would be similar, if not greater in the U.S.
Practices at Aravind that made the most difference were shorter surgery durations; better reuse of surgical gowns, caps, booties, and blankets; multiuse pharmaceuticals; and more efficient sterilization of stainless steel instruments, so they can be reused the same day.
What High-Income Countries Can Learn
Aravind鈥檚 advances come as India seeks to end preventable blindness鈥攁 goal of the World Health Organization Vision 2020 initiative鈥攂y doubling its current cataract surgical rate.
If India鈥檚 ophthalmologists used the U.K.鈥檚 current surgical methods to achieve its goal, it would emit the same greenhouse gases as 250,000 passenger vehicles鈥 yearly mileage, say the study's authors. However, if India employed Aravind鈥檚 approach, it would emit the same greenhouse gases as only 9,000 passenger vehicles.
鈥淎s healthcare systems and professionals worldwide become more aware of and concerned for the public health implications of climate change and excessive resource use, efficient care delivery models must be better understood and promoted,鈥 says Dr. Thiel.
鈥淎ravind鈥檚 model for surgery鈥攊ts use of reusable instruments, energy-efficient appliances and air handling systems, and investment in low-carbon energy sources鈥攕erves as an example of more sustainable, efficient cataract surgery,鈥 adds senior author Joel S. Schuman, MD, chair of the 聽at 秘密研究所 Langone Health.
Along with Dr. Thiel and Dr. Schuman, the study authors are Emily Schehlein, Alan L. Robin, MD, and Osamah J. Saeedi, MD, of University of Maryland Medical Center; and Thulasiraj Ravilla, R.D. Ravindran, MD, and Rengaraj Venkatesh, MD, of Aravind Eye Care System. The study was funded by a Fulbright-Nehru Academic and Professional Excellence Award administered by the United States鈥揑ndia Educational Foundation. Dr. Saeedi is supported by a National Institutes of Health Career Development Grant K23 EY025014. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this research.